By, Springnewsng media limited March 24,2025

http://The recent approval of a state of emergency in Rivers State through a voice vote has sparked widespread controversy in Nigeria. Many political analystThe recent approval of a state of emergency in Rivers State through a voice vote has sparked widespread controversy in Nigeria. Many political analysts argue that this method of decision-making undermines democracy, violates constitutional provisions, and sets a dangerous precedent for the future, particularly as the country prepares for the 2027 general elections.

Voice Vote and Its Democratic Implications

A voice vote, where lawmakers simply say “aye” or “nay” without individual vote counting, is often used for minor legislative decisions. However, deploying this method for critical national matters—such as the approval of an emergency rule—raises concerns about transparency and accountability.

According to the 1999 Nigerian Constitution (as amended), Section 305(6b) requires a two-thirds majority of all members of each house of the National Assembly to approve a state of emergency. However, the National Assembly’s decision to bypass this constitutional requirement through a voice vote has led to allegations of legislative manipulation.

Renowned political economist and leadership expert, Professor Pat Utomi,http://Professor Pat Utomi, strongly criticized the move, stating:

“Democracy was murdered in Nigeria. The process was carried out with complete disregard for the sensitivities of Nigerians. Lawmakers have insulted the people by hiding behind a sham process. The National Assembly is no longer independent; it serves the executive’s interests.”

Similarly, legal expert Gbenga Ojo described the National Assemblyhttp://Gbenga Ojo described the National Assembly as a “rubber stamp” institution, warning that Nigeria risks slipping into a one-party state where dissenting voices are suppressed.

The Constitutional Crisis and Legal Debate

Senator Ireti Kingibe of the Labour Party firmly opposed the use of voice voting, stating that the decision directly violated the Constitution:

“A two-thirds majority is required for significant decisions like approving an emergency proclamation, and this level of consensus cannot be accurately determined by a voice vote.”

This concern was echoed by former presidential candidate Peter Obi, who argued that:

“Using a voice vote for such a critical matter is not just insufficient; it’s a dangerous precedent. If we can bend the rules so easily, what stops us from undermining other pillars of democracy?”

The controversy raises fears that future legislative decisions, including those concerning electoral laws, constitutional amendments, and fundamental rights, could be decided through similar undemocratic means.

Impact on Nigeria’s 2027 Elections

The use of voice voting to approve a state of emergency signals potential threats to Nigeria’s democratic process ahead of the 2027 elections. Critics warn that if lawmakers can manipulate legislative procedures on crucial national matters, similar tactics could be used to influence electoral processes, approve electoral amendments without proper scrutiny, or even alter election results.

Political scholar Dr. Jibrin Ibrahim argues that:

“If the integrity of legislative processes is compromised now, the 2027 elections may witness increased executive interference, election malpractice, and voter suppression. The erosion of democracy does not happen overnight; it begins with small but dangerous compromises like this.”

Furthermore, a weakened opposition and a compliant legislature could make it easier for the ruling party to push through controversial electoral reforms that favor incumbents, ultimately undermining free and fair elections.

Conclusion

The approval of a state of emergency in Rivers State through a voice vote exposes deep flaws in Nigeria’s legislative process and democratic governance. As legal experts, political scholars, and opposition figures have pointed out, this decision sets a troubling precedent that could influence the 2027 elections and weaken democracy. To prevent further erosion of democratic institutions, Nigerians must demand electoral and legislative transparency, ensuring that constitutional provisions are upheld and democratic principles protected.